Case Studies

Case Studies
  • Typical Cases of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Municipal Courts

  • Awarded the top ten typical IPR cases by provincial units

  • Funto’s total number of cases awarded as typical cases

  • 2021


    Guangdong Chao Shi Dai Yan Panels Investment Partnership (Limited Partnership), Mr.Liu infringed on the trademark rights and involved in unfair competition with Funto’s client Mona Lisa Group Co., Ltd. [Case No. (2020) Yue 06 Min Final 9962]. The case of "brand name infringement" was awarded 3.2 million RMB, selected as one of the "Top Ten Typical Cases of Trademark and Unfair Competition in Foshan Intermediate People's Court in 2021"; and rated as one of the "2021 Lingnan Intellectual Property Litigation Excellent Cases" by Guangdong Knowledge Economy Development Promotion Association and Guangzhou Lawyers Association.

  • 2018


    The case of Foshan Fei Lu Ceiling Fan General Factory and Guangdong Fei Lu Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. was selected as one of the Foshan Intermediate People's Court [2018 Typical Cases of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Foshan Courts], one of the only five typical cases for the year.





  • The case of Guangdong Weimei Ceramics Co. v. Foshan Kopi Co. and other defendants in a dispute over infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition was selected by the People's Court of Chancheng District as one of the [2016-2018 Top Ten Cases of First Instance Civil Trial of Intellectual Property Rights in Foshan.





  • The case of Guangdong Dongpeng Ceramics Co. v. Gao Yi Huide Co. and other defendants in a dispute over infringement of trademark rights was selected by the People's Court of Chancheng District as one of the [2016-2018 Foshan Top Ten Cases of First Instance Civil Trial on Intellectual Property Rights





  • The case of Swan v. Shuangfeng, TCL and other defendants in the trademark and unfair competition case was pronounced that several defendants compensated 3.5 million yuan in economic losses, and TCL assumed full joint and several liability. The case broke through the statutory limit of no more than 3 million yuan in damages under the trademark law, selected by Guangdong Trademark Association as an excellent legal award.




  • In the case of Haitian v. Hai na bai chuan Company and other seven defendants about apple cider vinegar trademark infringement and unfair competition, via extensive investigation and evidence, Funto filed a case in Foshan Central Court jurisdiction. The case claims were fully supported, and the first trial damages amounted to 2.1 million, with the legal representatives of the main defendants bearing joint and several infringement liability. The case was selected as one of the Top Ten Typical Intellectual Property Cases of Guangdong Lawyers in 2017 by the Intellectual Property Professional Committee of Guangdong Lawyers Association.





  • The case of Foshan Dingji Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. v. Rui Bo Company and four other defendants in a dispute over infringement of invention patents was fully supported by the preservation of evidence and the application of the rule of evidentiary obstruction, and the claim was awarded a sum of 1 million yuan in first instance, reaching the top of the statutory compensation, and the legal representatives of the main defendants were jointly and severally liable for the infringement. The case was selected as one of the "Top Ten Typical Intellectual Property Cases of Guangdong Lawyers in 2017" by the Intellectual Property Professional Committee of Guangdong Lawyers Association, and was included in the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court's 2017 White Paper on the Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property.




  • 2017年


    In the case of Midea Group v. Meibo and other defendants on trademark and unfair competition, the court found that the defendants' use of the trademark as a model number constituted infringement, and the case was included in the 2017 Foshan Central Court White Paper on Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property.



  • In the case of Ltd.Mona lisa v. Foshan mengnailisa Ceramics Co., Ltd., defendants Wang xx, Zhang xx and Lin xx infringed trademark rights and were involved in unfair competition, which was awarded as one of the Foshan Intermediate People's Court's Top Ten Intellectual Property Cases of 2015.






  • The case of Foshan Shunde Fangchuang Electric Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Daidaijia Trading Co., Ltd. in a dispute over commercial defamation and false propaganda was named as one of the Foshan Intermediate People's Court's Top Ten Intellectual Property Cases of 2015.





  • In the case of Foshan Haitian Seasoning Food Co., Ltd. v. Shandong Haitian Food Group Co., Ltd., Dezhou Yunxiang Food Co., Ltd. and Cheng Moumou in a dispute over infringement of trademark rights and unfair competition was named as one of the Foshan Intermediate People's Court's Top Ten Intellectual Property Cases of 2015.





  • Represented Foshan Haitian Seasoning Food Co., Ltd. and Foshan Haitian (Gaoming) Seasoning Food Co., Ltd. v. Kou Moumou in a dispute over infringement of trade secrets was awarded as one of the top ten IPR cases of 2015 by the Foshan Intermediate People's Court.



查看更多

阅读关于典型案例的文章

揭秘!方图典型案例:海天案。获评为:佛山市中级人民法院2015年度十大知识产权案例

点击阅读

揭秘!方图典型案例的幕后花絮——蒙娜丽莎篇

点击阅读
阅读更多